In Madison, Wisconsin, a conservative law group has initiated a lawsuit against the State Bar of Wisconsin. Filed this past Wednesday, the lawsuit challenges the State Bar’s diversity clerkship program, alleging that it engages in racial discrimination and thus contravenes constitutional norms.
The program at the center of this debate offers summer internship opportunities to first-year law students, connecting them with prominent law firms, corporations, and government agencies across Wisconsin. Notable past participants in this program include major organizations such as Alliant Energy, Froedtert Health, Kohler Co., as well as municipal government bodies like the City of Madison, and state-level departments including the Wisconsin Department of Justice and the Department of Corrections.
Core Disagreements in the Legal Challenge
Brought forward by the Wisconsin Institute for Law and Liberty (WILL), the lawsuit contends that the clerkship program infringes upon the constitutional right to equal protection for law students, alleging that it sets race-based criteria for eligibility. Furthermore, the legal action takes issue with the program’s funding mechanism, claiming that the mandatory fees collected from members to support the program encroach upon the free speech and association rights of those members who oppose the use of their dues for such purposes.
State Bar of Wisconsin’s Defense
Larry J. Martin, the executive director of the State Bar of Wisconsin, has committed to a strong defense of the program, affirming its importance in supporting law students within the state. He emphasized that race and ethnicity are not prerequisites for participation in the program.
According to the bar’s website, the initiative aims to support University of Wisconsin and Marquette University law students from historically marginalized groups in the legal profession. The lawsuit, however, claims that this focus on enhancing racial diversity represents a recent shift in the program’s orientation.
Impact and Backlash of the Program
Since its creation 30 years ago, the program has facilitated approximately 600 internships. Attorney Daniel Suhr, a bar association member involved in the lawsuit, has expressed his objections to what he sees as preferential treatment within the program and the use of his annual dues for its operation.
Broader Implications of the Legal Action
This legal case is reflective of an increasing national movement opposing initiatives related to diversity, equity, and inclusion, particularly following a decision by the U.S. Supreme Court that prohibits the consideration of race in college admissions processes. Initiated in the U.S. District Court for the Eastern District of Wisconsin, this lawsuit seeks to put an end to the bar association’s existing oversight and endorsement of their internship program.
©unityus.org